Abstract
Purpose
The population of adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15–39 years) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors is growing, however long-term overall survival patterns and disparities are largely unknown.
Methods
The current study utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to assess the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, and rurality on long-term survival in 5-year DLBCL survivors using an accelerated failure time model.
Results
Included were 4767 5-year survivors of AYA DLBCL diagnosed between the years 1980 and 2009 with a median follow-up time of 13.4 years. Non-Hispanic Black survivors had significantly worse long-term survival than non-Hispanic White survivors (Survival Time Ratio (STR): 0.53, p < 0.0001). Male sex (STR: 0.57, p < 0.0001) and older age at diagnosis were also associated with reduced long-term survival. There was no evidence that survival disparities improved over time.
Conclusions
Racial disparities persist well into survivorship among AYA DLBCL survivors. Studies investigating specific factors associated with survival disparities are urgently needed to better address these disparities.
Highlights
- • Racial disparities in survival persist decades into AYA DLBCL survivorship.
- • Male survivors have worse long-term survival than female survivors.
- • Older age at diagnosis is associated with unfavorable long-term survival.
- • Disparities have not improved over time.
1
Introduction
Each year there are approximately 90,000 new cancer diagnoses in the adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15–39 years) population in the United States and cancer incidence in this group has risen by about 30% over the past four decades . Accompanying this increase has been an improvement in 5-year mortality to > 80% , leading to a growing population of survivors of AYA cancer. As the population of survivors grows, more data on long-term outcomes is needed. Compared with knowledge of long-term outcomes in the childhood cancer population , data in the AYA survivor population is lacking. Prior studies have reported that long-term survival in AYA cancer survivors is compromised compared with the general population .
Socioeconomic status (SES), rurality, race and ethnicity are known to impact 5-year survival in AYA cancer patients, with low SES neighborhood, rural area residence, and Black race associated with worse 5-year survival compared with high SES neighborhood metropolitan residence, and White race, respectively . Initial studies have shown these factors can also impact longer-term survival. There is evidence that racial disparities in survival persist at up to 10 years of follow-up , and a single institution study has found that low SES markers are associated with inferior survival at up to 15 years of follow-up in AYA cancer survivors . Among 5-year AYA Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, race and SES have been found to impact survival at up to 30 years of follow-up . Additional studies are needed assessing long-term survival disparities in other common AYA cancer types.
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and the most common lymphoid malignancy after classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the AYA population . With treatment advances such as the addition of rituximab therapy, 5-year survival of AYA DLBCL has improved to about 80% in recent years . To date, data on racial/ethnic and SES disparities in AYA DLBCL survival are sparse and even less is known about long-term mortality disparities. With incidence increases of NHL among AYAs outpacing the increased incidence of cancer in general in this population , knowledge of long-term mortality disparities is important to guide survivorship care. Utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, the current retrospective analysis sought to characterize long-term mortality outcomes over time among 5-year survivors of AYA DLBCL, with a focus on race/ethnicity, SES, rurality, diagnosis age, sex, and disease stage at diagnosis.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.